Last week I wrote an article explaining what I mean by the international banking cartel that operationally rules the economy–the Federal Reserve primary dealers. Some astute readers wondered why I didn’t report on the global regulatory institutions that have power over that cartel. Good question. And others asked for more clarity on the cartel itself.
Regarding the first question, I purposely focused on the cartel because so many people still don’t believe it exists due to false free market propaganda. If people don’t realize that a cartel of predatory usury institutions operationally controls the US, then why would they care about the regulatory framework over those institutions?
But the point is well-taken. The article might have implied those 18 dealer banks have ultimate power. Not at all. The key word in the above paragraphs is “operationally.” The dealers operate within a larger framework. They do not strategically rule over the framework itself. The ultimate rulers are the most senior private capital pools in the world who use the dealers as capital laundering machines and who create their desired framework through the central banks, IMF, BIS, and political institutions like the European Union and G20.
Since WWII, their desired framework has been to fuel global empire by milking the US population through the debt-dollar system centered around the Fed. Now that the US has been milked dry, things are shifting to a new milking center for the 21st century–China. Behind the scenes will be the senior capital pools currently in London and New York and the banking establishment in Switzerland, but on the surface Asia will emerge with profound power as China becomes the operational center of a new global empire based on a new global currency. At that point, the key dealers will simply plug into that new system. The world will think this represents the end of the US empire. But a US empire never really existed. More accurately the US was simply the latest host of the parasitic international banking empire that leeches off countries and plays them against each other. The parasite will quietly slither into Asia while using its media to blame the US host for the damage it has done.
Now a few points of clarity for those who want to better understand the cartel dealers:
- They are not equal. Some play long-term strategic chess as they’re aligned with the senior capital pools mentioned above. Others play the short-term profit game as the chess players allow them. Of the US firms, JP Morgan Chase and Goldman Sachs are on top. While Goldman may appear to be #1 since its people have literally run key government agencies for about 20 years, I’d suggest that JPM Chase is preeminent. Not only does it have the most power due to its derivatives position, which gives it the highest claim on capital in the US, but also it’s the merger of the old aristocratic interests behind JP Morgan and the Rockefeller interests behind Chase Manhattan. So let’s just say it wouldn’t be in your financial interest to bet against this bank. Its power was demonstrated after the crash of 2008. The media suggested JPM emerged unscathed because it was the honest, good bank whereas bad, greedy banks failed. Yeah, and I live with Puff the Magic Dragon. Ask yourself, after the Corleone family killed the leaders of competitive families in The Godfather, did Congress investigate the losing families, or did they investigate Corleone? So why did Congress investigate the losing banks!? You don’t blame the firms that were driven out of business. You look to the firm that benefited most. The fact is, the crash of 2008 was the trigger for a restructuring M&A transaction of the US economy, and had there been a tombstone printed in the WSJ, just speculating here, the lead bank would have likely been JPM.
- Some members change over time. These are the short-term profit players. For example, Countrywide was a dealer while it helped inflate the real estate bubble and BT Alex Brown was a dealer while it helped inflate the first tech bubble. Both of them were leaders of their short-term niche markets because of their privileged risk/cost position as dealers, and both of them were acquired by senior dealers for a deep discount once senior capital was pulled, bursting their respective bubbles and leaving the losses in the hands of junior capital.
- The cartel is international, so we no longer live in a world of independent countries. It would be more appropriate to view countries as administrative districts of the banking system so the financial elite class can extract value from the lower and middle classes. One of the key insights from the movie Braveheart was how the royal elite from different countries cooperated with each other against the masses. Today it’s more sophisticated. The mathematical, formulaic banking system aligns the financial elite in different countries together against their populations by managing them as digits on a balance sheet. It’s a simple matter of math, accounting, and system management, not conspiracy.
- Both political parties serve the cartel. It controls and profits from the private sector corporate system (typically championed by the political right) and the government welfare system (typically championed by the political left). Choosing between Democrats and Republicans changes nothing.
- Finally, it means conventional wisdom about money is false. The problem isn’t that our money isn’t gold-backed. The problem isn’t fiat money. The problem is that all money is hierarchically controlled as an asset to private sector institutions and elite capital holders who have the ability to call-in their chips, i.e. your bank digits, whereas it’s an interest-bearing debt to governments and the people. This has immense ramifications I don’t have room to address here. Government neither prints money nor causes inflation in this system (if it would like the original colonies did to escape British banker austerity and usury, some of the current unemployed would have jobs and those losing their homes in foreclosure might find some relief). Rather, the cartel controls all money and drives inflation/deflation cycles. It has driven consistent inflation for 60+ years. So we are now facing painful deflation, or hyperinflation if the government makes a key mistake, as the senior capital pools attempt to bring about the new banking/currency framework. If the money system isn’t changed, the emergence of the 21st century global empire mentioned above is only a matter of time.
Excellent article. Your point about the operational function of the visible or public institutions is spot on. Banking and investment vehicles like Goldman Sachs are economic management agencies – intermediaries. The real power is invisible. The preeminent merchants learned a long time ago that a visible ruler is a vulnerable ruler; so they rule by proxy through multiple intermediary companies and agencies.
The World is dividing into two blocs – the Plutonomy and the rest….both blocs are pushed around by the monetary paradigm. Some think the current economic decline has little or no impact on the rich. That needs to be challenged. Perhaps they are pushed around by a far more ruthless, psychological mind set. Fear of loss! Key dealers are not as committed to making money as as the rest of us, they are driven by a much stronger fear of loss and have built up a high functioning set of technological tools to ward of loss. Using this technology, they take high risks based on the information as it presents. Moreover they take high risks because they have the slack to do so.
Sandwiched between these to extremely unsavory slices the monetary system presents the definite and undeniable prospect of world wide, cheap labor. More and more people will lose their Jobs For Money”, even a highly skilled medical surgeon will lose a “JOB FOR MONEY” to robotic technology.
This is threatening, but it need not be, since people within both blocs are problem solvers; people are curious, people are generous and capable. Nature presents us, a story of constant change, this is yet one, of many paradigm, changes.
“The new plutonomy doesn’t need us to make money. It doesn’t need us to spend money, apparently. “Emerging markets” are going to replace us any day now and then, as far as Wall Street is concerned, we can all live in tents under bridges. This is capitalism. It’s not their problem.”
So why must we be pathologically polite? Let’s simply turn the tables by adopting the life style of the plutocracy. The advanced future does not need a “job for money”. This is not easy to get your head around. Time and timing enters into it.
The resource based group is the paragon of efficiency, and it all happens so fast, reason never masters nature, just tries to keep up, or synchronize with, the constant change, that nature’s information stream evokes. Now with this information stream a complimentary flow of problems presents. We take up our true vocations, of solving the constant flow of problems, not preoccupied with answers or beliefs but rather the stackable solutions. A job for money by comparison, is a waste of human life. A “job for money” is a contrivance, with a long beard[1850 B.C] … It was not a free choice; it was decreed upon mankind. The natural, system, over time, does not make promises it can not keep, this script is part of the CPU.
Within the current monetary economic system, there are no options. Fixated as we are, constituents of both blocs stand in line to go crazy … People on these pages Que. up to point out the petulant, assholes … yet we get huffy about change?
Hundreds of years ago, had we not been forced out of the resource based economy, we were well able to handle, we would have observed what worked and, designed around our limitations. Let’s abandon the work ethic as nothing more than a spent piece of chariot trash.
Our problems are technological. With IT networks, it is estimated that there are over 1 trillion hours per year of cognitive surplus up for grabs. This powerful surplus can and will, change the world. We need only to direct it’s power to design a new paradigm. If not now, then when?
Great analysis! Thanks for the well-presented videos and your appearances on Max Keiser. Looking forward to hearing more on solutions.
Question RE: “The fact is, the crash of 2008 was the trigger for a restructuring M&A transaction of the US economy, and had there been a tombstone printed in the WSJ, just speculating here, the lead bank would have likely been JPM.”
Please clarify – Am I mistaken – didn’t JPM come out on top after 2008? Why the reference to the tombstone in WSJ?
Aldo, a tombstone is just the advertisement printed in the Wall St Journal when Wall St firms conduct IPOs and M&A transactions.
The bank cartel is a complicated web and between the two articles, I have a more succinct understanding of the hierarchy. Thanks.
To address just one of the issues; in the past few years, there has been a migration of global finance from west to east – not just assets – but people actually relocating and reporting back on the east’s enormous economic opportunities. This is an obvious indication that the US no longer adequately serves the parasitic interests and a flashing red light about our economic condition (on life support). It will be interesting to observe, regarding finance, whether there is much distinction between capitalism and communism.
Governments seem to be little more than the facilitators for this global financial scheme. I wonder… will we see a shift in Chinese policy to fully accommodate their hosts? The economic system made the US unimaginably prosperous over the past 50 years. Will the Chinese people enjoy that same level of prosperity? Currently, reports suggest that Chinese workers are experiencing high levels of stress minus the personal benefits. Won’t they have to play the role of self-indulgent consumer for the economic system to work to the standards the cartel is accustomed? Without engaging an entire society in the economic scheme; will it continue to work, will the Chinese government capitulate, or will it die out? Just speculating.
From a western perspective, this seems like a turning point from which conditions could get globally ugly, or an opportunity to begin to reject the current system and allow a new and hopefully better one to evolve.
citizenk, the new system will be slow-growth or no-growth, so it will look quite different from the 20th century system fueled from the US. China has demonstrated it is an effective top-down control system for peasants living in a no-growth environment while a small bourgeois class is driving some growth under their banking system. That’s one of the reasons the global banking system is shifting there and attempting to standardize other countries on the Chinese model.
From my perspective as an ethnic Chinese person (though not a citizen of the PRC), it would appear that you have missed an important element in your analysis, that being the Chinese psyche. A lot of us still hold the view that recent Chinese history since the time of the Opium Wars has been one of humiliation by Western powers (funded by those nefarious bankers). That being the case, why would the Chinese want to plug into a system that is controlled by Westerners, since that would mean further subjugation?
In respect of the claim of there being ‘an effective top-down control system for peasants ‘ in China today, I’d think that many of us who read the Chinese online press and blogosphere regarding current developments there would disagree with the statement. There are not a few of us who are counting the days to the start of a Sino-US war so that the CCP can distract the peasants and attempt to prolong their tenuous grip on power.
http://www.infowars.com/bombshell-barack-obama-conclusively-outed-as-cia-creation/
Out with the Global Elite and the Criminal Government – That Has Performed A Hostile Corporate Take Over of America!
The Government that has taken over America, is not American! Outsiders are running our country!
The reasons why, we must vote out, Establishment Government Representatives, whether they are Left or Right – Incumbent or Candidate!
Make sure the candidates and incumbents, do not belong to any of the Global Elitist Organizations: Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commission, Council on Foreign Relations, Club of Rome, Skull and Bones, Canadian Council of Chief Executives,
Harvard Elite Players, Goldman Sachs, International Monetary Fund, The United Nations, World Health Organization, World Trade Organization.
The reason we must vote out Establishment Government Representatives, whether they are Left or Right, Incumbent or Candidate is explained on this 2 minute News Clip below:
TWO Party Paradyne System News clip:
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/2824363/the_obama_deception_extra_part_2/
We Americans, who wish to stop the thieving and robbing, of your income and resources in your country, by the Globalist Banksters need to, “End the Fed”! Help Ron Paul out on this one folks! There in lays our freedom!
PS: Please pass this information on to your friends – as – time is getting short, Obama and the Elites are pushing hard to start World war III with Iran, a distraction to save Obama’s failing presidency, in an effort to get the sheep rallying around Obama!
Here is a lengthy commentary I wrote several weeks ago:
https://docs.google.com/Edit?docid=0AYIIubhFF_WrZGQ4cmpwdjVfMTBobjN2dndncg&pli=1
In this treatise, I wonder if the “operational banks” will emerge with yet another round of derivative sales….as the Fin Re Act only legitimizes these transactions within the banking system rather than eliminates them…and with so many foreclosed mortgages still kept off the books might the proprietary brokerage arm of each TBTF bank issue many more “risky” yet acceptable bundles of yet another CLO, ABS or other SIV to the many State run pension funds that are mandated to earn 7.75% interest( as is the Florida Pension fund )…what else is available? Clearly the pilfering of the US middle class has yet to come to a close…And yes I believe we have entered the Chinese Century…the US has become yet another “banana republic”…exporting batteries???? I am in concurrence with most of your article and the prio0r one as well
Your analysis does not take into account control fraud and theft. The Countrywides and other short-lived institutions were just get rich quick schemes by fraudsters. These are the same people like Charles Keating and Mike Milken from the 1980′s S&L Crisis. Same bag of tricks, similar schemes, just different facades. No doubt that there are some wealthy and powerful families pulling strings behind the scenes. Protecting their wealth through bailouts would be one reason for some of the bank bailouts, but covering up massive fraud would be another. I’ll need to reread your essay and ponder it some more.
John, it’s not an issue of random greed and get rich quick. Such clowns don’t get to be primary Fed dealers unless the strategic power players at the top have a reason to put them there. William K. Black is awesome, a brilliant regulator, but spreading the notion that the crash of 08 was a result of accounting fraud lets the strategic chess players at the top of the system off the hook. It is not simple accounting fraud, but strategic Machiavellian fraud being perpetrated to restructure the US–an entirely different level of fraud than what regulators look at.
Regarding shifts toward China mentioned by citizenk:
An important thing to keep in mind about China is that it is culturally and demographically very different from the US, and much of that is based upon some 3,000+ years of history.
Chinese culture and governance has historically been founded in centralized authoritarianism, dating back to the earliest dynasties. People only rebel when a dynasty (of which the ruling CP is simply the most recent variety) is seen as losing the Mandate of Heaven. The intense reaction of the CP in the wake of recent natural disasters — moving quickly to give the impression of their being in control of the situation — gives a bit of insight into the importance that this concept still holds within the cultural mindset of China. It is much easier to enforce higher levels of inequality under an authoritarian regime than a decentralized one.
Demographically, where the West depended upon animals to provide much of their labor, Chinese population boomed because more people => greater farm production => more food in the earlier stages of their civilizational development. Chinese agriculture has historically been VERY labor intensive. While this is certainly changing, the legacy in terms of population demographics still hold. Thus, it will be much easier to maintain adequate levels of consumption (in the absence of resource limits, which is whole other discussion) with a large underclass in a population of 1.25 billion, than it would be to do the same in a population of 300 million.
I have a question. Would any type of document flow chart, with say the names of signatures by men of largess or their personal legal reps, be able to show how typical transactions proceed in this hierarchical control structure? Or is there no clear line to be found following market responses to the decisions of senior capital pools?
After having personally investigated the collusion of mega-media incs. and noticing the inordinate occurrence of the same names on the boards of directors of each megacorp I came to realize that a high level of behind the scenes organization was taking place. Is there no way to show some kind of name trail or paper trail that leads back to senior capital pools? If it is possible, is it safe enough to do so? The skeptics out there by and large will need some kind of visual proof to make it real to them. If possible and relatively safe then it’s time to put some faces on the farmers.
Unfortunately no. Their capital is distributed across hundreds of nondescript LLCs, anonymous partnerships, “arms length” foundations, etc. Just like there was no clear line to the old mafia dons, there’s no clear line to the senior capital pools. RICO was necessary to bring down the dons. Same would be necessary here. The skeptics will never be convinced.
If one understands the concept of financial leverage, then the lines are very clear. But the legal code of the US treats financial leverage as sacrosanct rather than the violent, bullying, ruthless reality that it is.
Caravaggio posted a link to some interesting charts in part 1 of the series.
If the skeptics will never be convinced, then what exactly is the purpose of this article? In fact, your whole video series seems to be an education process to let the “skeptics” know that they are in an economic hierarchical power structure, but using intelligent language as opposed to emotional language that is widely used by most of those who are publicly spreading this information.
Please notice that most of your readership already understands in full or part that they are enmeshed in this power structure. If renewal is truly your purpose (and I wholeheartedly believe so) then I am at odds with how this is coming across. I keep getting the feeling that you believe in your secret darkness that there is nothing to stop the forces you speak of.
You provide us with only one solution to our immediate problem and that is a return a government backed non-debt based currency (at least as I understand it). Then why not plug The American Party PAC as a possible solution? http://www.swarmusa.com/vb4/content.php
As far as I can tell you have two main novelties.
1. Your explanation of our current economic systems through the metaphor of meteorology. It is genius no doubt.
2. That you have established a council on renewal that is unafraid to acknowledge and challenge the paradigm of current power bases.
How do these compliment each other?
Because I love you, I ask!
These owner elites are sometimes exposed. One case that comes to mind was about the issue of Mikhail Khodorkovsky former “owner” of that huge Russian energy conglomerate, Yukos. When Putin jailed him and the Yukos assetts were being auctioned off, who then steped forth but Jacob Rothschild, claiming that Khodorkovsky had entrusted the enterprise to him. It seems to me that Khodorkovsky was only a frontman and the true owner was Rothschild. Those were the days when these enormous Russian assetts were divided up as spoils by some very clever people.
I previously submitted a question to you Damon Vrabel and have not received a reply. Do you selectively filter or censor who you respond to?
John Medeiros
sorry John. no I don’t selectively respond. I just do a lot of other things which means I sometimes have to let my articles go and not keep up with the responses.
what did you ask?
When I heard of this banking cartel or elite families all over the world monopolizing the banking industry and governments’ was about 15 to 17 years ago and I thought the first gentlemen that discussed this with me was a nut, although he did spark a nerve, since I had just went through the late 80′s recession. I started doing a little research on the internet and books (The Jekyll Island Affair) and believe me I have watched this model of the one world government, or one world bank take place before my eyes like a bad dream. The next was a prominent attorney in 2001. I believe this and try to talk with anyone I can about what is happening to our country, but most people don’t believe human beings could be this manipulative and evil to steal from their own country that gave them their wealth. This is a great site and I have emailed everyone I can with your website, because this is a war which is going to be hard fought and our economy is going down unless we get rid of the Federal Reserve and their cronies. I just hope it is not to late!!!
Hi 无业游民,
For some reason the system wouldn’t let me reply specifically to your post. Thank you for that perspective. I think it’s essential to understand the diverse perspective as opposed to engaging in typically narrow western thinking from within western borders.
You ask why China would want to plug into a system controlled by westerners. Just look at the G2 relationship…they’re plugged in BIG time. The Bank of China has clearly jumped in bed with the bankers. Now the question is whether it’s really controlled by westerners. No. It’s controlled by the elite bankers who have no regional/national loyalties and they have given China a crapload of power that will likely torpedo the West in the end.
I would just repeat that this is an issue of class, not nationality, race, etc. The elitist class of the world (royal/banking/politburo types) realized long ago it’s in their interest to cooperate against the lower classes across all countries. For example, while ethnic Japanese culture might think in Japanese terms, their royal family has been aligned with the European royals and global bankers since WWII.
So the question is, is China’s ruling elite loyal to China and the Chinese culture or is it just a typical narcissistic elite willing to cooperate with other narcissists? You would know the answer to that better than me, but it seems from the outside that their elite doesn’t care about the Chinese masses. A narcissistic elite would prey upon precisely the Chinese sentiments you describe toward the West to fuel warfare, i.e. pit the Chinese masses against the Western masses, in a way that serves the elite. In fact I think this is their plan and it’s how they’ll launch the Asian century as the world is fooled into thinking Asia is finally giving the West its due payback while the truth is it’s just a stageshow that hides the global elite working together.
Some ancient history as proclaimed by Gary Allen: from the article “Rockefeller- Campaigning for the new world order”
We also know that David and Nelson
Rockefeller have long called for the
“normalizing of relations” and establishing “trade” with Mao Tse-tung and the Red Chinese. And we know that Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger have reversed the Republican platform and a hundred Nixon promises to follow that line also, by opening the door for trade with the butchers of Red China.
While Mr. Nixon’s sudden cozying upto
thePeking mob has attracted reams of
comment and publicity, there is one aspect of all this which has attracted virtually no attention. I refer to the fact that large oil
deposits have been found near the Senkaka
Islands in the East China Sea, a territory
claimed by both Nationalist and Red China, as well as by Japan. TheNew York Times of April 10, 1971, reported that the State Department had advised several American oil concerns to cease exploring the area. Reports within the oil industry indicate that Standard Oil was permitted to move in after the others left. Standard is as much Rockefeller property as Henry Kissinger, Mr. Nixon’s top China advisor.
In dealing with Red China, so far, we have made numerous concessions and have asked none in return. Perhaps one of
*Nelson Rockefeller has never been exactly what you would call an anti-Communist. Harris Smith, on Page 367 of his book,O.S.S.: The Secret history Of America’s
First Central Intelligence Agency(University of
California Press, Berkeley, 1972), reveals that Walter Bedell Smith, former chief of staff to General Eisen- hower, Ambassador to Moscow, and Director of the C.I.A., “once warned Eisenhower that Rockefeller was a Communist.”
the concessions “we” will receive will be drilling rights for Standard Oil. After all, David Rockefeller has been promoting an opening of Red China trade for the past five years. The plot thickens, as they say, and in this case oil is thicker than blood.
After all, we know from U.S. News &
World Report of August 13, 1973, that
Chase Manhattan Bank has entered into an
agreement with the Bank of China “to
handle the financing and mechanics of exports and imports with the United States,” as David Rockefeller explained it upon returning from Peking. Business Week of July 14, 1973, quotes Frederick Heldring, vice chairman of Philadelphia National Bank, as stating: “Communists are often
very conservative [sic]. They like to deal
with the largest capitalist institutions. If you add Rockefeller in, you’ve got the equation.”
I think your analysis is brilliant. I just don’t have a lot of faith that the population as a whole can withdraw from the “matrix” long enough to change things (grass roots); or to even see things as they really are; or if they can, it will be decades with new generations that will have to be deprogrammed. My question to you is: How does a person protect themselves and their family NOW? How do you feel about precious metals in this context?
thanks!
I don’t think one can protect themselves by only looking at financial assets. That’s the old paradigm, though the advantage of PMs is they reside outside the banking/brokerage system…good thing. The new paradigm will likely redefine markets and investment/trading options such that what we think of as safe today may be rendered legally worthless tomorrow. Of course the new paradigm might also redefine things like freedom and property rights, so the challenge of protecting oneself is even more difficult. But I like what colleague Chris Martenson says about resiliency in our lives (food, water, shelter, heat, etc). Checkout his website and his recent resiliency articles.
Pingback: Damon Vrabel – Global Empire and the International Banking Cartel (part 2) | Debt Relief Articles | Loan Articles
Pingback: Shadowtraders » Blog Archive » Global empire and international banking, part 2
Hey Damon, loving your work here and elsewhere, and eager to immerse myself even more in this kind of info and thinking. After years of meandering intellectually through the usual political/economic literature it’s been really satisfying to stumble into you and others more or less on your team (Ellen Brown, for instance). Theory be damned; what interests me is the way the world really works. Any chance you might create a page of recommendations to further books, websites and articles that would provide even more enlightenment?
Pingback: Vrabel, Soetoro och Gul «
you are 100% rigth rotschild khazar city of london( east indian co)owners of bank ticks rotten world system has determined the fall of usa and rise of china from 1970
( nixon-kissinger ping pong diplomacy)
now usa and ue must going down by the drain ,they are too expensives for them ,the world face a gargantuan deflation- inflation
what is next ? NWO WWWIII or what ?
what those satanics overlord beast prepare for planet earth ?
BUT we have ligth of hope ,27 feb 2010 a little country in the southern tip of south america Chile suffer a violent 8,8 ritcher eartquake, damages over 30 billions dollars ,
400 people died ,rebuild and solidarity of people start inmedeately ,
then 6 august 2010, 33 cooper miners were traped beneath 1 km under a broken hill,the mine was in operation against all security warning ,by two greedy owners Bhon and Kemeny (jews)the rescue labor start inmedeately and now the world know ,all 33 are alive ,with hard work and full cooperation of a lot of people ,they will be bring to safe place on surface in 2 -3 month ,God allow .
What the world must understand now we all 6.6 billions humans we are buried and trapped by the most hideous greedy and ruthless conspiracy of power and brutality, under kilometers of fake debts,those humble miners have a message of hope for humanity we will be capable of get out of this miserable trap .Human spirit is invaluable has no price .WE HUMANS we shall overcome WE KNOW NOW THANKS CHILEAN MINERS ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡http://www.lun.com/Pages/NewsDetail.aspx?dt=2010-08-23&PaginaId=14&bodyid=0
Damon wrote:
Oooops…sorry…messed up the post above…
That’s not Damon’s quote, it was my comment and question. Damon’s quote:
“But a US empire never really existed. More accurately the US was simply the latest host of the parasitic international banking empire that leeches off countries and plays them against each other. The parasite will quietly slither into Asia while using its media to blame the US host for the damage it has done.”
Larry
Pingback: Renewal High Advanced 1 Oz
Pingback: Nathan’s Economic Edge: Damon Vrabel Part 2 Global Empire and the International Banking Cartel | Get Smart About Banks
the bankers have been driving inflation/deflation for many more moons than 60 years. the only time they didn’t were a few moments of brief of history, namely during the american revolution and civil war. we’ve always been on a system where banks get charters to issue money based on fractionalized reserves. the federal reserve only inserted a middle man between the big banks and the small banks. it was a gold standard before the federal reserve. it was almost the same gold standard after the federal reserve.
remember, the dollar was so strong during the great depression, it increased in value. and never forget the crime of 1873.
Thomas Jefferson said in 1802:
‘I believe that
banking institutions are more dangerous to
our liberties than standing armies.
If the American people ever allow
private banks to control the issue of their
currency, first by inflation, then by
deflation, the banks and corporations that will
grow up around the banks will deprive the people
of all property – until their children
wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers
conquered.’
Question : I am currently watching a French production called “Les Rois Maudits”, a historical TV series done by French TV WHEN IT WAS STILL A PUBLIC SERVICE….
The series starts with Philippe Le Bel, French Capetian king during the 14th century.
EVEN IN THE 14th century, the Lombardian PRIVATE bankers are calling the shots, surreptiously slipping money into one hand while taking it out of another.
While the emerging monarchy, and centralized state vies with rival interests in the Church, and other equivalent nobles (Burgundy, for example) the banksters are behind it all, making and breaking empires through controlling the money…
(At least this is the way it seems to me, watching.)
The banksters have NO IDEAS, and NO IDEALS, either. They…. will always go where the money may be. Nothing new under the sun, right ??
I think, however that you are mistaken when you talk about the INDIVIDUAL PEOPLE, (or even individual class) who is “responsible” for “milking the citizen”.
Because I think that THE SYSTEM ensures that events will run the way they run.
One of the biggest mistakes WE have made is making filthy lucre so incredibly DEMATERIALIZED. (WHY have we dematerialized filthy lucre to this extent ? That is a fascinating question that would take a book to treat, at least…)
The credit card is, at the individual level, an indication of how dematerialized our “money” has become.
The more money is dematerialized, the easier it is for it to go… anywhere, and at any time. ALL OVER THE PLANET.
But you’ve probably realized that the dematerialization of money goes hand in hand with the dematerialization that has allowed the INTERNET to exist too, right ?
All those… advantages that come along with those disadvantages.
And vice versa…
Damon,
A little off-topic to your article, but could write a post or do a video explaining the North Dakota banking system and the benefits of this system?
Pingback: The International Monopoly Banking Cartel explained, i.e. Banksters fascism;Who makes money from perpetual Wars? Brilliance of James Madison « Anti Oligarch
Just wondering what your thoughts are regarding the Venus Project.
Hey, you have a great blog here! I’m definitely going to bookmark you! Thank you for your info.And this is **Above Pools** site/blog. It pretty much covers ###Above Pools## related stuff.
They’ll all be sucking in the same bad air day in another few years as yours and mine… At the present rate, most life will be dead on this earth in 5 to 35 years… This will allow the planet a few thousand years to recupe from the “EXPERIENCE” of us….
Holy,.. Holy
Thomas Jefferson said in 1802:
‘I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property – until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.’
This is what you’re trying to say,.. Isn’t it?… He just says it so succinctly it becomes memorable… Ain’t it so, MA?
Where to find Information About the subject? משכנתא
The Scribes and the Pharisees have the best documented early credit monopoly, with their money-changer goons, and also the solution presented by Yeshua.
What exactly anyone reported produced a great deal of good sense. Yet, think of the following, imagine if an individual extra a little written content? I am talking about, WHEN I dont would like to let you know how you can go the blog, yet let’s say you included some thing to help perhaps acquire individuals consideration? As being a online video media or even any photo or 2 to receive people looking forward to what youve have got to express. For me, it might produce a person’s website turn on a bit more.
Thank you so much, great post! Precisely what I required to get.