The mass media stageshow is a hoot. Remember that all of this is controlled by the top folks in CFR (the inner financiers behind the Wall St cartel). Just like Tom Cruise in The Firm, those top folks use CFR membership to control/influence/co-opt the rest of the people in the group. Who are some of those people? McChrystal is CFR. Petraeus is CFR. James Jones is CFR. Gates is CFR. Eikenberry is CFR. In fact, Obama’s entire team is CFR, just like Bush’s was. Much of the media is also CFR.
The motive of the top controllers in this McChrystal vs. Obama episode could be any one of many possibilities…
- CFR wanted to stoke an Obama vs. military fight to rally the “raging war machine right” for the 2010 elections against Obama rather than leaving room for 3rd party and other efforts to save the US from Wall Street.
- CFR simply wanted to put Petraeus back on the front page as they groom him for the 2012 presidential campaign. He has been a good yes-man for his Wall Street CFR controllers. They like careerist generals like Petraeus and Richard Myers who are subservient yes-men doing whatever they’re told to feel the affirmation of pleasing their bosses and getting more medals. They also like ruthless frigid generals like Barry McCaffrey (or lower ranks like Oliver North) who massacred thousands on orders even though they were retreating, which violated every sense of morality and international law, but that’s not Petraeus.
- CFR needed to replace McChrystal because he started seeing the truth, feeling his conscience, and siding with his soldiers vs. his controllers back in NY. CFR would’ve had insiders close to McChrystal to know his general mindset and even overhear his private conversations to detect if he was straying from their desired goal to maintain their presence in Afghanistan perpetually to control all the natural gas, mineral deposits, opium, and otherwise keep the process on track of managing young Americans to their deaths in order to convert Afghanistan into a satellite state of our banking/corporate empire. By the way, this doesn’t mean they’re necessarily using secret people. They simply surround executives (from the President all the way down through civilian and military chains of command) with big staffs, and those staffs report up their own chains of command where they all eventually reach the top of the Pentagon, State, etc where inner CFR members typically rule. But it could be secret people as well. The CIA uses assets inside all sorts of organizations–foreign governments, corporations, military units, state governments, etc–to ensure they’re secretly staying on top of things. And CIA serves CFR/Wall St.
Overall this media stageshow is probably a strategic chess move to accomplish a combination of all 3 of these things and then some. Just don’t let yourself be caught in their manipulations. And help explain this to your friends, family, neighbors. The media is used to accomplish strategic objectives, NOT to report news.
Excellent piece.
thanks
g
Great Article.
I was looking for the angle on this stage play.
Thanks
Petraeus was at the Bildeberger 2009 meeting.
How is it an active duty officer can associate with
an internationalist group with it’s own agenda?
Isn’t that close to treason? He has sworn an oath
to the US Constitution!
Makes me nervous to contemplate that it is THAT well organized. If it were not playing out the way you describe, I wouldn’t believe it.
Keep up the insightful work
Jim
My first thought was that he was opposing the ramping up for the coming attack on Iran,. but yes, obviously, he was not fired for talkin’ smack about his bosses. This was a face saving way to replace the head of a strugaling occupation force, without saying what he was doing wrong (or right).
From CFR site; “The focus should be on scaling back U.S. military presence, on what more can be done to induce some Taliban leaders and troops to reject working with al-Qaeda and join the Afghan political process–and on what is to be done to those who refuse.”
Join us or die?
I agree, however there are other secret societies involved in promoting this world government agenda. One of the most infuluencial is the masonic order. Its dogma calls for the establishment of a “universal” brotherhood of man, which is now manifest in the communist dogma of “all races, colors, creeds as equals” consistant with the Law of the Sea (international law). This is the policy of Lucifer, their “Bearer of Light” (which is what the name means in English) whose “light” they purport to be seeking, as stated on p. 324 of Pike’s Morals and Dogma.
This is an effort to destroy patriotism and allegiance to ones country, as all nations are outgrowths of a primal family connected by sanguinity (blood) and a common gene pool. A house divided against itself cannot stand. Which flag will someone with divided allegiances (diversity) commit to support? If you do not stand for something, you will fall for anything.
Secret socities have oaths of allegiance binding their members to obediance to the order superceeding all others, including loyalty to the nation and the constitution. Is it any wonder that things are happening as they are with no change in sight?
Pingback: Damon Vrabel – McChrystal vs. Obama | EmpirestateFX.com
Pingback: Check out Damon Vrabel’s new blog | Ron's Matrix Sentry
Pingback: Ron's Matrix Sentry
i am reading this post now….
there is this article in the daily beast, its the viewpoint of Siraj Haqqani (a senior taliban commander) on the topic:(do read this)
http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2010-06-25/taliban-mcchrystal-sacking-a-victory/?cid=hp:mostpopular1
anyone have a reaction to this article?
what do you people think?
could it be that McChrystal actually committed political hari kari on purpose to avoid being the general who lost the war or because he couldnt handle the pressure any longer?
or could it be that the taliban dont understand the complex workings of the banker/CFR/military/media system?
anyone with a professional/insider-info opinion? Damon?
Hi Salman, sure it’s possible that article could be accurate. It basically fits with my #3…that McChrystal was seeing the light, finding his conscience, siding with his soldiers and the Afghan people, and maybe just wanted to get out. I didn’t mean to imply in my post that McChrystal’s thoughts/statements were part of the larger plan.
But overhearing the statements, the handling of it in the media, in the administration, in the pentagon, the choice of Petraeus, etc. are the sorts of things I’m talking about in terms of CFR orchestrating it. That’s the stageshow.
JW, yes one could make the argument it’s treason. But of course since the higher level civilian officials in the rest of the agencies of the US government are associated with these groups, there’s no “legal authority” (if you recall Gore’s phrase from the Clinton days) to take action. This is why I’m calling for a bottom-up enlightenment, like JFK called for. Change won’t happen top-down.
frank- “all races, colors, creeds as equals” is communist dogma?? Seems like a simple truth,. ‘all men are created equal’ ring a bell? Patriatism as in ‘self identification with a nation-state’ is a terribly distructive impulse, leading people to oppress and kill others due to there otherness. “A “universal” brotherhood of man” sounds like a great idea to me, perhaps I should join the lucifarian masonic order, only i dont like the concept of organised religion.
I am all for one world with no nation states,. just not under the control of a few wealth elite,. I would prefer we be self organised atonomus collectives interconected to cooperate for a common good. This system would require the abandonment of all faith-based cults of organised religion as these, like nationalism, lead to the fear of otherness,. and the deviding of the one human race from itself. United we stand indeed..,
I am all for one world with no nation states,. just not under the control of a few wealth elite
The only way to have “one world with no nation states” is to have it controlled by a few wealthy elite.
What we need is to get back to community. All politics need to be local.
“All politics need to be local”
Well that would work fine, till some local goup far away from your local goup, decided to build empire. Through economic and military means they grow non-local and eventualy they come to your hood and you must assimilate or die,. . . ugly.
I belive, all people require the same basic elements to live and be happy,. and that we can all agree on some basics as far as resource uses, human rights, and cooperation,. we need local control of local politics, with in an interconnected network of volantary cooperationg comunities. This will stop the rise of control freek despots and empire seeds,. if we ignore the world around our community that world will destroy our community.
“The only way to have “one world with no nation states” is to have it controlled by a few wealthy elite.”
Why? (my model works flawlessley in my mind
even if i am not always clearly explaning it!) but just saying it can’t work, does not give me anything to go on, to fix my model,. . a world wide federated republic, with no politicians,. a fully direct democracy. Public debat is now possible at any scale, (internet forums are a close model) local, state, federation, moderated debat through facilitators,. that hold no power over any decition, the rise of good ideas that people can get behind.’ Say what you like about Chomsky, one thing he tought me, by endlessly pointing the fact out, is that if you look at serious polls of the people, they do largly agree on a great many things., and these issues are normally always applied in the near opposet way by elected governments,. . perpelexing perhaps,. but it does make one realise that given a proper system of debat and a direct democracy with no political class,. sanity is likely to prevail.
“- CFR simply wanted to put Petraeus back on the front page as they groom him for the 2012 presidential campaign. He has been a good yes-man for his Wall Street CFR controllers. They like careerist generals like Petraeus and Richard Myers who are subservient yes-men doing whatever they’re told to feel the affirmation of pleasing their bosses and getting more medals. They also like ruthless frigid generals like Barry McCaffrey (or lower ranks like Oliver North) who massacred thousands on orders even though they were retreating, which violated every sense of morality and international law, but that’s not Petraeus.”
Damon, please read this,
http://inteltrends.wordpress.com/2010/07/29/islamic-emirate-of-afghanistan-gen-petraeus-new-war-strategy-mass-murder/
i think that he may be careerist…but is still a cold blooded mass murderer….
or at least…thats been his trademark “success” strategy in iraq in the past…and now thats what he wants to use in afghanistan…..they dont call him the “butcher of iraq” for nothing….that wikileaks video that emerged of the apache helicopter killing innocent people was an incident that took place during his tenure as commander there in 2007..its a brief snapshot of the SOP(standard operating procedures) and ROE(rules of engagement)of the forces he commanded… he drew up those cruel, sick, wicked and callous SOPs and ROEs….. which turned the entire country into a huge genocidal free fire zone….. where killing everything and anything was not just OK but actually encouraged and required……(especially MAMS…or military aged males….regardless of whether they were insurgents or not…..)
he had a major role in that needless and inhumane bloodbath……so did odierno…..who was under him at the time…..
here,
here is a an article
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2010/6/24/879087/-Petraeus-the-Butcher-of-Iraq-Coming-to-Town
…….where he is called that term “butcher of iraq”….
Pingback: Damon Vrabel – McChrystal vs. Obama | Debt Relief Articles | Loan Articles